It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
--Macbeth, Act V, Scene V
Okay, we’re not calling the Bush Administration idiots, but the “sound and fury” line sure applies here.
Hybrid technology is an important part of the fuel economy landscape, but when it comes to near-term efforts to reduce America’s oil dependence, the 800 lb. gorilla in the room is using existing technologies to increase the fuel economy of the conventional gasoline vehicle fleet. That’s why it’s so important for vehicle enthusiasts of all stripes to know about yesterday’s release of the Bush Administration’s highly disappointing final rule on revising Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for so-called “light trucks.”
Here are some highlights from the UCS reaction:
“After the Bush administration acknowledged our oil addiction, one might have expected a slam dunk, but this is an air ball,” said David Friedman, research director for the Clean Vehicles Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists. “The administration squandered an important opportunity to treat our oil addiction.”
The NHTSA standards would require SUVs, pickups and minivans (so-called light trucks) to increase their fuel economy by 1.8 mpg by 2011 (i.e. to 24.0 mpg in 2011), beginning with model year 2008. This is essentially a repackaged version of their August fuel economy proposal. The administration could have saved one million barrels of oil per day in 2025 if it had simply raised the new standards to 26 mpg by 2011 and applied the standards to all light trucks. This would have met 20 percent of the president’s target of cutting oil imports from the Middle East by 75 percent by 2025.
The rule also included heavier SUVs and vans (medium duty passenger vehicles - MDPV) for the first time but ignored heavier pickups. If they had included heavier pickups like the Ford F-350 and Chevrolet Silverado 3500, NHTSA could have saved four times as much as they did from including MDPVs.
“Fighting America’s oil addiction with these standards is like fighting lung cancer by smoking 49 cigarettes a day instead of 50,” said Don MacKenzie, vehicles engineer with the Union of Concerned Scientists. “Automakers have technology on their shelves right now that could cost-effectively improve the efficiency of light trucks to 26 or 27 mpg, at least double the increase that NHTSA announced today.”
You can read our full statement here.
Through the UCS “Extreme Auto Makeover” campaign, and other alerts from our colleague organizations, over 100,000 Americans took the time out to weigh in on the administration’s proposed rule and ask for real improvements that would have genuinely addressed America’s “oil addiction” problem to which the President himself admitted. The result: even with the projected steep and sustained increase in oil prices from the Energy Information Administration, NHTSA found a way to tweak their own assumptions in order to keep the final rule an almost exact carbon copy of their flawed proposal.
Of course, the administration is pushing this squandered opportunity as an historic achievement. It is vital that Congress realizes that the public is not buying the President’s spin, and understands the depth of disappointment Americans have for this side-stepping of responsibility at such a crucial time. The expectation for Congress must now be clear—step up and fill the oil security void left by the administration’s rule, or be complicit with Bush’s tough talk--no action approach. If you want to vent your spleen to your Senators and Representative, click here to send them a letter.
Posted by: ScottN
HD pickups are designed to do heavy work. Making the trucks lighter weight, with smaller engines, and "more efficient" gear ratios may make you feel good but will simply force owners to switch to even larger trucks to haul the same loads.
Posted by: Dave | April 01, 2006 at 06:39 PM
The US has NO oil addiction!!! Let's stop using emotionally laden metaphors as an excuse for thinking!!!
I grow tired of all the IDIOTS who insist we have a Problem because they feel a particular way about an issue.
The US consumes oil - so what!!!
The US economy is growing and the standard of living inthe US is improving every single day!!!
The oil trade enable other nations across the globe to develop their economies. This is a good.
What is the BAD? Dependence? No so.
Again, let's use reason versus emotionally laden metaphors as an excuse to feel and attack others.
Posted by: nancy | April 02, 2006 at 09:58 AM
Dave,
We've done a considerable amount of work looking at the potential for improving fuel economy across the vehicle fleet. The following fact sheet addresses some of the concerns you raised about the effect of CAFE standards on working trucks.
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_vehicles/cars_pickups_suvs/working-truck-fuel-economy-facts.html
Fact: Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for light trucks can be increased while setting realistic targets for working trucks. It is not necessary for every truck sold to meet the CAFE standard. CAFE standards are based on the average fuel economy of a manufacturer’s entire fleet of trucks. So, while everyone will be better off with higher CAFE standards, some vehicles can be well below the standard, while others can be above the standard.
Fact: Fuel economy can be increased with the same or even better power, utility, and safety. The technology is available today to make all light trucks, including work trucks, significantly more efficient. Automakers are sitting on a large number of fuel-saving technologies that have the potential to increase the fuel economy of a full-size pickup from 20.3 mpg to 33.7 mpg over the next ten years, while maintaining the safety, performance, and utility on which buyers have come to rely.
Fact: Increasing fuel economy standards will significantly reduce the overall financial burden on consumers. Fuel-saving technologies can deliver cost-effective increases in fuel economy that will save consumers money. Increasing the fuel economy of a full-size pickup from 20.3 mpg to 33.7 mpg would save the owner more than $7,000 in fuel costs over the life of the vehicle at a gas price of $2.50 / gallon. The technology additions needed to achieve this would increase the purchase price of the new vehicle by only $2,200, which would be recovered through lower fuel costs in less than four years of driving.
Posted by: Don | April 10, 2006 at 05:17 PM
Nancy,
Burning oil to fuel our cars and trucks is a major source of global warming pollution. Our cars and trucks release more CO2 from burning fossil fuels than most countries (all except China, Japan, Russia, and of course, the US) emit from all sources combined. If we want to get serious about tackling climate change, improving the fuel economy of our vehicles has got to be part of the solution.
As for the oil addiction issue, I'll leave the security concerns to the experts:
http://www.iags.org/
Posted by: Don | April 10, 2006 at 05:24 PM
ENDING GLOBAL WARMING NOW Automakers make more money out of big cars than smaller cars. They don't care what they run on as long as they sell. So the perfect automobile for our immediate future becomes the flex fuel hybrid. The pushbike supporters will lament a powerful, first at the lights petroleum powered hybrid. But the flex fuel modification will immediately follow. A high-powered, eco-friendly, flex fuel vehicle is what the up-market, savvy will soon demand.
Switching to biodiesel, ethanol and flex fueled cars will be our savior for stopping more Katrinas in the US, more crazy flooding in the EU and more droughts in Australia and Central Africa. Download and read my book Priority One from our web site. The information is all there,tell your friends. There is no charge. www.yeomansplow.com.au
Then let's bite the bullet and tax a barrel of oil to never let it ever go BELOW $65 a barrel. Then, and only then can bio-fuel growers and producers safely and rapidly expand and beat the oil rich at their own game. The Saudis have already threatened the West that if bio-fuels producers become a threat to them they will slash their oil prices for a sufficient period to send the bio-fuel growers broke. That's why a minimum price holding oil tax is essential. Let tropical South America grow the fuel for the US of A. That's where palm oil and sugar grow great and it solves a lot of other problems.
Posted by: Allan Yeomans | April 30, 2006 at 02:53 AM
Okay, we’re not calling the Bush Administration idiots, but the “sound and fury” line sure applies here.
That is so funny
Posted by: Dirk van de Broek | November 23, 2006 at 04:52 PM
Thanks for your article. Very cute information about Bush Administration, that's really true, I think.
Regards, kenny. Visit my site: http://urlbounce.com/go/mFYTL
Posted by: Kenny wayne | December 02, 2006 at 01:30 PM
I did some research on Pew and Gallop polls and it turns out the majority of Americans are in support of raising fuel economy standards.
I hope we can find a way to build an organized movement to push for serious increases in CAFE standards soon!
Posted by: Nathan - How To Prevent Global Warming Newsletter | February 03, 2007 at 12:20 AM
cant stop laughing, funny picture :)
http://rulingcatsanddogs.com/contents/funny-pics/page-2/large-files/cat-carrier-joke-Tabby-Tote-domestic-animals-humor-pic.jpg
Posted by: bradbury300 | June 26, 2007 at 04:49 AM
resident race ig geting interesting! I think next president will be Woman!
Posted by: Rematiemy | July 18, 2007 at 12:13 PM
On permanent and temporary job of the worker of Animalsafe Inc. are required people in age from 18 years in Usa,Canada,UK and other countries.
Donates manager must work with people who want to do donates and help them in financial questions.Payment from 1500$/month.
Call manager must answered a call and give a consultation. Payment from 1800$/month.
Manager in the office center must Work with clients, with different business papers and correspondence. Full day(8 hours) employment. Payment from 2500$/month.
The basic requirements: love nature and animals, Skill to communicate, Ability to work in a command. Ability to put interests of company higher then own.
For more info visit our web-site www.animalsafe.biz
Posted by: Animalsafe_Inc. | June 17, 2008 at 10:33 AM
Nice story! Can I use this for my blog? gr, remcowoudstra
Posted by: making biodiesel | June 28, 2008 at 03:58 PM
Please enter our site
www.u-serv.co.il
just take a look and please if you can
click on the google ads thanks for your time!
www.u-serv.co.il
http://www.u-serv.co.il/
Posted by: u-servdoo | July 28, 2008 at 08:58 PM